Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Documentation style fixes

As to the general direction I am in full agreement with what you and
Jonathan discussed in the review of your series, namely:

 - We prefer dashless these days;

 - Reference to a concrete command line is <code>git clone</code> which is
   typeset differently from general descriptions of what <emphasis>git
   clone</emphasis> command does.

I'd like to proceed with this series by (1) pulling from you and queuing
the result in 'next', (2) asking other people (including Jonathan) to
proofread and send necessary updates to the list, (3) asking you to check
and queue these updates from others yourself and tell me to pull again to
my 'next', and (4) merging the result to 'master' when done.

Does it sound workable?  Am I placing too much undue burden on you?