Re: git-reflog 70 minutes at 100% cpu and counting
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:54
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 19:26 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Eric Paris wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 16:23 -0500, Jeff King wrote:quoted
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:20:29PM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:quoted
Updated to git-1.6.5.3-1 from Fedora rawhide and still git reflog ran for >5 minutes at 100% cpu (I killed it, it didn't finish) I'm pushing a copy of the whole repo (all 1.9G after bzip compression) to http://people.redhat.com/~eparis/git-tar/Wowzers, that's big. Can you send just what's in .git?So I zipped up just .git 1.2G. I did a make clean and zipped up the whole repo 1.3G. Just started pushing the 1.3G file. Maybe having a .git directory that large is the problem?Shouldn't be, unless your repo is really badly packed. What's the output of 'git count-objects -v' ?
count: 87065 size: 866744 in-pack: 1203497 packs: 148 size-pack: 976474 prune-packable: 1611 garbage: 0 It's not home movies :) . It's a kernel trees with about 5 'upstream' trees that are remotes, which I update daily. One of the remotes constantly rebases every day starting with Linus' tree and pulling in about 150+ branches of work from others all of which might rebase. I have (needlessly) the tags he keeps of that repo every day. I daily rebase my work on top of that constantly rebasing tree (linux-next) using stgit. I noticed just blindly poking at sizes in my .git/object/pack that the largest pack is a lot larger than the second and third largest.... -r--r--r-- 1 paris paris 108031039 Feb 12 2009 pack-71a9c0f08c76b8ffd1cf0a14d7cfe991fbc9db80.pack -r--r--r-- 1 paris paris 32670479 Apr 7 2009 pack-5c8333301012d9b70d70648b287cf540afcc63ed.pack -r--r--r-- 1 paris paris 26728958 Dec 30 2008 pack-fb8ceb5a33d9881fe771860c6006f55f73ecdf65.pack And all total there is almost 1G of data in .git/object/pack If the answer really is that I just have too much data and it can't be handled, I'm fine exporting my patches getting some clean trees and starting over till I get in this situation again, but if it really is a problem/bug that can be solved, the full tar ball of my repo is at http://people.redhat.com/~eparis/git-tar/ -Eric