Re: [PATCH 1/3] Better document the original repository layout.

Hi,

On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Michael J Gruber wrote:

Michael Haggerty venit, vidit, dixit 04.12.2009 15:36:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <redacted>
---
 t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh |    9 +++++----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
index 3a37793..073674f 100755
--- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
+++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh

@@ -16,13 +16,14 @@ set_fake_editor
 
 # set up two branches like this:
 #
-# A - B - C - D - E
+# A - B - C - D - E     (master)
 #   \
-#     F - G - H
+#     F - G - H         (branch1)
 #       \
-#         I
+#         I             (branch2)
 #
-# where B, D and G touch the same file.
+# where B, D and G touch the same file.  In addition, set tags at
+# points A, F, and I.
 
 test_expect_success 'setup' '
 	: > file1 &&

My first reaction to the subject was "Huh? What repository?". So I
suggest something like

t3404: Better document the original repository layout

as a more descriptive subject.

That would be good, the patch itself is already good.

ACK