Test 16/17 had been fixed since its introduction in b4d1690 (Teach Git
to respect skip-worktree bit (reading part), 2009-08-20). So, mark it as
expect_success rather than expect_failure.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <redacted>
---
I'm actually wondering about 17/17 as well.
If commit is called with a file name then shouldn't it simply commit the
current state of the file in the worktree, no matter what the index or
skip-worktree say? I therefore think 17/17 should be expect_success
and have no test_must_fail.
t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh b/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh
index e996928..8960dd9 100755
--- a/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh
+++ b/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ test_expect_success 'git-rm succeeds on skip-worktree absent entries' '
git rm 1
'
-test_expect_failure 'commit on skip-worktree absent entries' '
+test_expect_success 'commit on skip-worktree absent entries' '
git reset &&
setup_absent &&
test_must_fail git commit -m null 1
--
1.6.6.rc0.274.g71380