[RFC/PATCH 0/2] status -s: Use the same config as status · Michael J Gruber <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[RFC/PATCH 1/2] status -s: respect the status.relativePaths option · Michael J Gruber <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] status -s: respect the status.relativePaths option · Jeff King <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[RFC/PATCH 2/2] status -s: obey color.status · Michael J Gruber <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] status -s: obey color.status · Johannes Sixt <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] status -s: obey color.status · Michael J Gruber <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] status -s: obey color.status

From: Johannes Sixt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:46

Michael J Gruber schrieb:

* Is there any policy regarding use of putchar/puts vs. printf?

If the printed string contains color escapes that should be obeyed, you
can use only fputs, printf, and fprintf. You should not use puts or putchar.

* Even if I were to write tests for status -s: How do I test colors?

See t4034-diff-words.sh.

-- Hannes