Re: excerpts from tomorrow's "What's cooking" draft
From: Sverre Rabbelier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:43
Heya, On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:45, Daniel Barkalow [off-list ref] wrote:
Okay, finally got to it just now. This is entirely untested (because I don't have anything that uses it), but it compiles and should be correct. It would be nice to get a clean bill of health on it from valgrind.
After a lot of manual comparison of valgrind traces (comparing cloning
a local git repo and a local hg repo), I have found the following
before applying your patch (I removed the ==proc== and "by 0xDEADBEEF"
noise):
20 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 24 of 95
at : calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418)
by : xcalloc (wrapper.c:75)
by : get_importer (transport-helper.c:132)
by : fetch_with_import (transport-helper.c:150)
by : fetch (transport-helper.c:198)
by : transport_fetch_refs (transport.c:977)
by : cmd_clone (builtin-clone.c:538)
by : run_builtin (git.c:251)
by : handle_internal_command (git.c:396)
by : run_argv (git.c:438)
by : main (git.c:509)
60 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 43 of 95
at : realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
by : xrealloc (wrapper.c:59)
by : strbuf_grow (strbuf.c:61)
by : strbuf_getwholeline (strbuf.c:335)
by : strbuf_getline (strbuf.c:349)
by : get_helper (transport-helper.c:52)
by : get_refs_list (transport-helper.c:228)
by : transport_get_remote_refs (transport.c:943)
by : cmd_clone (builtin-clone.c:535)
by : run_builtin (git.c:251)
by : handle_internal_command (git.c:396)
by : run_argv (git.c:438)
65 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 47 of 95
at : malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
by : realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
by : xrealloc (wrapper.c:59)
by : strbuf_grow (strbuf.c:61)
by : strbuf_addf (strbuf.c:199)
by : get_helper (transport-helper.c:69)
by : get_refs_list (transport-helper.c:228)
by : transport_get_remote_refs (transport.c:943)
by : cmd_clone (builtin-clone.c:535)
by : run_builtin (git.c:251)
by : handle_internal_command (git.c:396)
by : run_argv (git.c:438)
65 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 50 of 95
at : malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
by : realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
by : xrealloc (wrapper.c:59)
by : strbuf_grow (strbuf.c:61)
by : strbuf_addf (strbuf.c:199)
by : fetch_with_import (transport-helper.c:158)
by : fetch (transport-helper.c:198)
by : transport_fetch_refs (transport.c:977)
by : cmd_clone (builtin-clone.c:538)
by : run_builtin (git.c:251)
by : handle_internal_command (git.c:396)
by : run_argv (git.c:438)
123 (96 direct, 27 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost
in loss record 71 of 95
at : malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
by : realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
by : xrealloc (wrapper.c:59)
by : get_helper (transport-helper.c:62)
by : get_refs_list (transport-helper.c:228)
by : transport_get_remote_refs (transport.c:943)
by : cmd_clone (builtin-clone.c:535)
by : run_builtin (git.c:251)
by : handle_internal_command (git.c:396)
by : run_argv (git.c:438)
by : main (git.c:509)
Annotated with the relevant source and my comments:
by : get_importer (transport-helper.c:132)
fastimport->argv = xcalloc(5, sizeof(*fastimport->argv));
You never free fastimport->argv.
by : get_helper (transport-helper.c:52)
if (strbuf_getline(&buf, file, '\n') == EOF)
You never strbuf_release(&buf).
by : get_helper (transport-helper.c:69)
strbuf_addf(&gitdir, "gitdir %s\n", get_git_dir());
I do strbuf_reset(&gitdir), which should of course be
strbuf_release(&gitdir), oops.
by : fetch_with_import (transport-helper.c:158)
strbuf_addf(&buf, "import %s\n", posn->name);
Same here, you never strbuf_release(&buf).
by : get_helper (transport-helper.c:62)
ALLOC_GROW(refspecs,
refspec_nr + 1,
refspec_alloc);
This would of course be fixed by your patch.
However, applying your patch causes:
error: Trying to write ref refs/heads/tip with nonexistant object
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
fatal: Cannot update the ref 'HEAD'.
If I comment out both new lines in disonnect_helper like so fixes that:
//free_refspec(data->refspec_nr, data->refspecs);
//data->refspecs = NULL;
Commenting out only one of the two makes the error return, any idea's?
--
Cheers,
Sverre Rabbelier