Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: thoughts on setting core.logAllRefUpdates default true for bare repos

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:40

Hi,

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
It seems to me an accidental push -f would cause some trouble on a bare 
repo, and would usually require a bit of grubbing around among the 
unreachable commits looking for the right one.
In one usage of mine, we have set said config value for exactly that 
reason.
What would be the downsides (other than some objects hanging
around far longer, i.e., space issues) of setting the config
variable core.logAllRefUpdates to be default true on bare
repos.
I did not have time yet to investigate, but it seems that there are 
problems with the permissions of shared bare repositories when activating 
the reflogs.

With gitweb on a public site, there might be a problem when you pushed 
some blob containing trade secrets accidentally, and try to scrub the 
repository using "git gc" after a forced push.

That are the only downsides I can think of.

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help