Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] Update packfile transfer protocol documentation

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:39

"Shawn O. Pearce" [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
"Shawn O. Pearce" [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I don't think we ever send an empty packet.  If we have no data to
send, why the hell did we create the packet header?
Oh, I do not disagree that it is pointless, but the example that followed
the part we are discussing also had "0004".  I think it is Ok to allow it.
If its pointless, why encourage it?  Why not discourage it with SHOULD NOT?
Oh, no, I didn't mean to _encourage_ it.

I just thought that it being pointless at the semantic level would already
be an enough discouragement for people who are intelligent enough.

As I said, this was not an objection to start with.
Sure, but can't packet_write just return early without write()
if format_packet returned 4 (aka vsnprintf returned 0)?
Ah, that's right.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help