Re: [PATCH] Use fast-forward

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Nanako Shiraishi [off-list ref] wrote:

Quoting Felipe Contreras [off-list ref]

quoted

As suggested in the mailing list, now I've replaced all instances of 'fast
forward' with 'fast-forward'.

I had an impression that the consensus from the previous
discussion was that there is no such consensus that this
is an improvement, because there isn't a clear-cut rule?

I don't think anyone wants to preserve the current inconsistent use,
and I haven't seen arguments in favor of 'fast forward' either. My
understanding was that the comments were in favor of 'fast-forward'
but making it consistent across the code-base:

http://marc.info/?l=git&m=125532404330701&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=git&m=125535210203730&w=2

-- 
Felipe Contreras