Re: Creating something like increasing revision numbers
From: David Aguilar <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:35
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 02:44:47AM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi all, thanks everyone for the nice feedback! On So, 18 Okt 2009, Daniel Barkalow wrote:quoted
It's possible as long as you don't think of the "version number" as a property of the commit, but rather a property that some commits get by virtue of having been at some time the commit that's what would be found on that particular server at that particular time. Even though the historyRight! That is a good point. In fact I don't care about (local) commits, but about the pushes to the central server.quoted
of the *content* is non-linear, the sequence of values stored in refs/heads/master on your central server is linear, local, and easy to enumerate.That is exactely what I need.
If you have any control over how people will use git, then you can give your constantly-incrementing revision number more stability by ensuring that everyone uses 'git pull --rebase'. That'll literally keep the history completely linear. If someone forgets then it's not a big deal; you'll just get a merge commit and the number will increment by 2 instead of by 1.
Now my follow-up questions: - how would one access this "sequence" number on the server
If you've done the "tag the initial commit" as suggested elsewhere on this thread: git tag projectname $(git rev-list HEAD | tail -n1) then you can do this with simply: git describe --tags It should output something like: projectname-101-g20912df
- is there a way to determine at which of this "sequence" numbers a specific file has been changed last?
commit=$(git log --pretty=%H -1 -- <filename>) git describe --tags $commit
JAIST Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology preining@jaist.ac.jp Vienna University of Technology preining@logic.at Debian Developer (Debian TeX Task Force) preining@debian.org
Just another happy Debian user here, -- David