Re: [PATCH v3.1 3/5] Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD] for reflog information

Quoting Jeff King [off-list ref]

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 04:48:11PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:

quoted

quoted

+NOTE: Some placeholders may depend on other options given to the
+revision traversal engine. For example, the `%g*` reflog options will
+insert an empty string unless we are traversing reflog entries (e.g., by
+`git log -g`). The `%d` placeholder will use the "short" decoration
+format if `--decorate` was not already provided on the command line.

Sure.  I figured it was obvious enough, but since you already went to
the lengths of documenting the exact behaviour of %d, I squashed it
and adjusted the acknowledgement in the commit message accordingly.

If the consensus (or Junio's decision when applying) is that we don't
need it, I don't mind if my suggestion is scrapped (or reworded).

I think your clarification is a good addition.

-- 
Nanako Shiraishi
http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/