Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] Proof-of-concept patch to remember what the detached HEAD was

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:33

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:52:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I like James's suggestion to allow us to store refs other than refs/heads/
in HEAD to denote this state, and keep commit and reset from updating such
a ref through updating HEAD.
Didn't we already consider and reject this the first time around? For
example, this thread has a ton of stuff about how we shouldn't prevent
people from making commits on the wandering state:

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/35777/focus=35835

And here's me even advocating this exact strategy (and I'm sure I didn't
think of it; it's probably discussed elsewhere, too):

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/35777/focus=35858

Not that I am not necessarily complaining, but I just hope this decision
is "with new-found knowledge we are revisiting this decision" and not
"we totally forgot about what came before".

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help