Re: Interim maintainer tree
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:28
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:06:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Thanks, both. I've fetched, but haven't fully examined "log ..spearce/*" nor "log ..peff/*" yet. I noticed that some topics in 'pu' have been rebased (not complaining, but just making sure I am not hallucinating). Do you have preferences/suggestions as to how to proceed? Should I just take the tips over at this point, or do you have some more patches you were polishing but haven't pushed out that I should wait for?
For my stuff, I think you can just take over my tips. I was just
collecting and polishing topics, while Shawn was doing integration. For
topics I have, please use my versions rather than applying from the
list; many of them have extra fixes squashed in, acked-by's collected
from the list, etc.
Here's a brief status report on what's in my tree:
proposed-master
One-off patches that I think should go straight to master.
ef/mscv-noreturn
This is the latest round and I think should be ready for at least
'next' (maybe even 'master' as it is really about the build and not
about functionality).
ef/msys-imap
This is from an RFC which has generated some comments. He should be
posting another round soon. 'pu' at best.
fc/mutt-alias
Latest round that addressed comments. Ready for 'next' if not
'master'.
jn/gitweb-patch
After some comments with Jakub, I think the code is right but he
promised a re-roll with more in the commit message.
mr/gitweb-snapshot
This is probably the pu rewind you saw. He posted a v5 of his
series. I didn't look at it closely, but Jakub ack'd it.
tf/doc-pt-br
Minor translation update, ack'd by somebody who can read it. :)
Ready for 'master'.
There are a few patches floating on the list that I haven't picked up or
looked too closely at yet. Just so we don't drop anything, they are:
- curl http auth tweak:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/129455
The author said he didn't really test it, and I haven't set up http
auth to test it with, but probably somebody should do so before
applying. :)
- a new rev-cache from Nick
- silence gcc warning:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/129485
The warning is overly cautious, I think, but it is a dubious enough
construct that it is probably worth fixing.
- enable openssl on msvc
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.msysgit/7238
This goes on top of ef/msys-imap, but I think that will be getting a
re-roll.
-Peff