"Shawn O. Pearce" [off-list ref] writes:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
A few questions (not criticisms).
* 1m50s to 4.5s is quite impressive, even if it is only in a repository
with unusual refs-vs-commits ratio, but I personally think 10 refs per
every commit is already on the borderline of being insane, and the
normal ratio would be more like 1 refs per every 10-20 commits.
Under Gerrit Code Review it is normaly to have 2-5 refs per commit,
every iteration of a patch is held as a commit and anchored by a
unique ref.
So we're borderline insane. :-)
Heh, that's way below 10 refs per commit, isn't it?