Re: bash_completion outside repo
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:23
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:quoted
I think something like that needs to "belong" to the diff code itself. I guess in the case of "diff", we could check all diff-related config at diff setup time.Not necessarily. You do not want to care about color configuration if you are doing diff --raw for example. The one that first uses the color variable should be able to notice the breakage, no?quoted
But what about something used in several places, like core.quotepath?Exactly the same way I checked what codepaths needed to fix for the autosetupmerge stuff. core.quotepath internally sets quote_path_fully, and the sole user of quote_path_fully is sq_must_quote() which is only used by next_quote_pos(). So you can have your check very isolated.
Note that I was _not_ defending the approach my illustration took. I
merely was pointing out that core.quotepath and diff.color are _not_
valid counterexamples to it.
A better counter-proposal would be made something along this line:
Currently, core.frotz and nitfol.rezrov both map internally to a
variable xyzzy, so config parser could set xyzzy = INVALID_INFOCOM
but the user of xyzzy cannot report which configuration variable
caused the error with your illustration scheme. Here is my
attempt to solve this issue.
...patch follows...
And I am sure we will be able to find such examples that my illustration
patch is not _exactly_ the best approach to solve pretty easily around
remote.*.* and branch.*.* variables.