Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] post-receive-email: do not call sendmail if no mail was generated

From: Lars Noschinski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:22

* Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] [09-09-08 22:15]:
Lars Noschinski [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
contrib/hooks/post-receive-email used to call the send_mail function
(and thus, /usr/sbin/sendmail), even if generate_mail generated no
output.  This is problematic, as the sendmail binary provided by exim4
generates an error mail if provided with an empty input.
I actually have a bigger question, not about the implementation but about
the cause.

If generate_email results in an empty output in this codepath:

	# Check if we've got anyone to send to
	if [ -z "$recipients" ]; then
		...
		echo >&2 "*** $config_name is not set so no email will be sent"
		echo >&2 "*** for $refname update $oldrev->$newrev"
		exit 0
	fi

shouldn't we rather receive an error e-mail than let the
misconfiguration go undetected?
Probably not. The error message is displayed to the user who did the
push. Normally (if no explicit From: address is configured), this is the
same user, which would receive the error mail.
Before this check, I do not see anywhere generate_email would return nor
exit, and after this check, there is a call to generate_email_header and
that guarantees that the output from the generate_email function is not
empty, so it looks to me that triggering this check is the only case your
patch would change the behaviour of the script.
Actually, there are a two cases in the case statement before, where
generate_email would return:

    refs/remotes/*,commit)
        # tracking branch
        refname_type="tracking branch"
        short_refname=${refname##refs/remotes/}
        echo >&2 "*** Push-update of tracking branch, $refname"
        echo >&2 "***  - no email generated."
        exit 0
        ;;
    *)
        # Anything else (is there anything else?)
        echo >&2 "*** Unknown type of update to $refname ($rev_type)"
        echo >&2 "***  - no email generated"
        exit 1
        ;;

i.e. if we are pushing to a branch neither in refs/tags nor refs/heads.

In our setting, the build process pushes to refs/builds, so we can track
code changes between different builds, without displaying a whole lot of
mostly useless branches or tags to the user.
quoted
diff --git a/contrib/hooks/post-receive-email b/contrib/hooks/post-receive-email
index 2a66063..c855c31 100755
--- a/contrib/hooks/post-receive-email
+++ b/contrib/hooks/post-receive-email
@@ -637,6 +637,16 @@ show_new_revisions()
 
 send_mail()
 {
+	OIFS=$IFS
+	IFS='
+'
+	read FIRSTLINE || exit 1
Shouldn't this be merely a "return"?  The caller looks like this:
Yes.

I'll fix it in the next patch (when there are further comments); but you
may fold it in (and add the SOB if forgot), if you prefer.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help