Re: `Git Status`-like output for two local branches
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:20
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:20:47PM -0400, Tim Visher wrote:
I'm interested in being able to get a message such as 'dev and master have diverged, having 1 and 2 commits different respectively' or 'dev is behind master by 3 commits and can be fast-forwarded', etc. I'm sure this is simple, but I can't figure out how to do it in the docs. Sorry for the noobness of the question.
No, there isn't a simple command to say "show me this status text for
these two arbitrary branches".
However, the process is relatively simple to implement in a shell
script:
1. Pick your two branches. I'm not clear on whether you want to
compare two arbitrary branches, or what.
For the regular "status", one is the current branch, and the other
is the "upstream" branch (as configured by your
branch.$current.merge variables). Calculating "upstream" can
actually be a bit tricky because it involves looking at several
configuraiton variables. However, recent versions of git allow this
shell snippet (the 'upstream' formatter was added in v1.6.3):
current=`git symbolic-ref HEAD`
upstream=`git for-each-ref --format='%(upstream)' $current`
2. Count the commits on each side that are not in the other. The
simplest way to do this is:
in_a=`git rev-list $b..$a -- | wc -l`
in_b=`git rev-list $a..$b -- | wc -l`
but the internal code actually does both traversals simultaneously,
which is slightly more efficient. You can also do that by parsing
the output of:
git rev-list --left-right $a...$b --
which will mark commits in "a" with a '<' and commits in "b" with
a '>'. I don't know whether the extra complexity is worth the
efficiency gain (in the internal code it is easier, since we
aren't actually generating output and parsing it; we just keep a
count).
3. Compare the counts. If:
a=0, b=0: they are the same commit
a=0, b>0: a is behind b by $b commits, and can be fast-forwarded
a>0, b=0: a is ahead of b by $a commits (and can be pushed, or b
can be fast-forwarded to a)
a>0, b>0: branches have diverged and have $a and $b commits
respectively
So it's easy to script, but not exactly a one-liner. We might be able to
do better if you reduce the problem space. What exactly are you trying
to accomplish?
-Peff