Re: [PATCH] Round-down years in "years+months" relative date view
From: Alex Riesen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:20
Nicolas Pitre, Fri, Aug 28, 2009 21:27:53 +0200:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Alex Riesen wrote:quoted
And shouldn't a linker complain regarding duplicated symbols, unless the other (library) symbol is defined as a weak symbol, allowing overriding it with another symbol of stronger linkage?Normally a linker would search for new objects to link only when there are still symbols to resolve. If the library is well architected (mind you I don't know if that is the case on Windows or OS X) you should find many small object files in a library, so to have only related functions together in a single object for only the needed code to be linked in the final binary. Hence the printf symbol should be in a separate object file than gettimeofday, etc. Only if the library's object file containing gettimeofday also contains another symbol pulled by the linker will you see a duplicated symbol error. But this is still a possibility. So your proposal is probably cleaner.
Is it so for dynamic linking as well? Like in libc.so?