On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Junio C Hamano[off-list ref] wrote:
Hmph, I don't know. Googling "overrideable" suggests "Did you mean
overridable?" which is enough clue for me.
Using a similar system, the Google hit count:
overrideable: 26,900
overridable: 339,000
overridden: 2,280,000
Which agrees with my intuition that you can get away with overridable,
but it's much more common to just use overridden.
"override" of course comes from "ride" (181,000,000). A horse can be
ridden (10,500,000) if it's ridable (82,500).
The bad news: rideable (201,000).
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ridable shows rideable as
the preferred spelling, but accepts both.
Have fun,
Avery