Re: question concerning branches

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:45, Ingo Brueckl[off-list ref] wrote:

But as software development often is something where you are coding on
several issues at the same time which can't be committed immediately, it
sounds that 'stash' is the developer's best friend.

Ingo

There is no problem with having temporary commits on local branches,
however.

Quite frequently, I'll "git commit -a -m 'Temp commit'; git checkout
other-branch".  As long as you don't make these temporary commits
public, it's very easy to munge them (See: "git rebase --interactive
<commitish>", and "git reset --soft <commitish>").

-Jacob