Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [RFC PATCH] stash: accept options also when subcommand 'save' is omitted

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:16

Hi,

On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
But it is sloppy, in that it blindly accepts options that might be 
valid for several subcommands, not just "save".
I wouldn't call that sloppy. 'save' is the default command, if you don't 
provide any command, then 'save' will be used.
'save' might be the default command, but we don't trigger it with _any_ 
crap, for a very good reason.  Read the commit log for git-stash.sh to 
know why.
quoted
So please register my objection.
I will if you register my objection to yours ;-).

Jokes aside,
If you think that's funny, I don't.  I actually put a lot of thought into 
the issue whether to allow _any_ parameter with looks like an option to 
trigger "save".  And I very much had to come to the decision that no, that 
is too dangerous.

So I cannot take your objection seriously.

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help