On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 01:54:19AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/wt-status.h
+++ b/wt-status.h
[...]
@@ -33,8 +32,12 @@ struct wt_status {
const char *reference;
int verbose;
int amend;
- int untracked;
int nowarn;
+ int wt_status_use_color;
+ int wt_status_relative_paths;
+ int wt_status_submodule_summary;
+ enum untracked_status_type show_untracked_files;
+
Is there a particular reason to use such enormous struct member names?
IOW, inside wt_status, why not just "use_color"?
Other than that, I think this is a very positive change (and in fact, I
like the way this whole series is shaping up).
-Peff