Re: [PATCH 3/3] transport: don't show push status if --quiet is given
From: Avery Pennarun <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:09
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Sverre Rabbelier[off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 13:23, Jeff King[off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+ for (; ref; ref = ref->next) { + switch (ref->status) { + case REF_STATUS_NONE: + case REF_STATUS_UPTODATE: + case REF_STATUS_OK: + break; + default: + return 1; + } + }Is my C getting sloppy or is this a non-looping loop? AFAICS it either return 1's on the first run, or breaks?
The "break" in this case breaks out of the switch, not the for. Avery