"git rev-list A B" really lists those commits which are included in A or
B, i.e. it lists those in A and those in B. Say so, because saying
"which are included in A and B" would mean those who are in both A and
B.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <redacted>
---
Patch against master.
The current description is simply wrong, which is why I strongly suggest this fix.
The upcoming suggests an extra paragraph for clarifying the use of multiple
revision arguments.
Documentation/git-rev-list.txt | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt b/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt
index a765cfa..847cc7d 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ command:
$ git rev-list foo bar ^baz
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-means "list all the commits which are included in 'foo' and 'bar', but
+means "list all the commits which are included in 'foo' or 'bar', but
not in 'baz'".
A special notation "'<commit1>'..'<commit2>'" can be used as a
--
1.6.4.70.g9c084