Re: janitoring

Pierre Habouzit [off-list ref] writes:

[PATCH 1/3] janitor: use NULL and not 0 for pointers.

  I really dislike the use of 0 when NULL is meant. This patch probably
  fixes most of them. The biggest culprit is nedmalloc, but a few
  remnants exist in plain git code.

I am not enthused about "fixing" borrowed foreign code, unless we know
that we are committed to support our fork.  My impression was that this
ned stuff was borrowed by the MinGW folks with the understanding that we
will slurp it with minimum modification and turn a blind eye to its
sub-par coding styles, so that it can be more easily updated from the
upstream?