Re: Correct way of making existing remote repository "bare"

Dirk Süsserott [off-list ref] writes:

I think what you did is 'porcellain' while my solution is 'plumbing'.
Any complaints?

No.

We need to be careful and either (1) to have anybody who adds 'plumbing'
procedure to any FAQ responsible for keeping it up to date, as the
implementation detail is subject to change, or (2) only to have
'Porcelain' description in the documentation.