Re: [PATCH 6/3] Export thread-safe version of 'has_symlink_leading_path()'

Kjetil Barvik [off-list ref] writes:

  I have looked at and tested (the version from the origin/pu branch, so
  it contains the memset() line squashed in) patch 5/3, 6/3 and 7/3, and
  all 3 patches looks correct, so you can add

     Reviewed-and-tested-by: Kjetil Barvik

  if you want to.

Thanks.

  But, I guess it is me which is a litle late to comment things, since I
  already see that all 3 patches is in the pu, next and master branches
  already, less than 3 days after beeing posted to the malinglist.

  But, would'nt it be a good thing to let all patches at least be in the
  pu branch for minimum x days before entering next and master?  Or: let
  it go minimum x days after beeing posted to the list before entering
  the next and master branch?  x = 4?

That number x depends on the quality of the patches and to a great extent
how well I know the area of the code affected by the patch.