Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCHv5 3/3] gitweb: gravatar url cache

flat view

From: Jacob Helwig <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:59

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 15:46, Giuseppe
Bilotta[off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Junio C Hamano[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I think the cache is placed at the wrong level (it doesn't have to be a
GRavatar_url_cache, but can be a general avatar_url_cache).
I'm not sure about it. The URL depends on email and size (can you use
arrays as hash keys in Perl?) , and the email part might be the same
but the size part might differ across separate calls (in theory; in
practice avatars in a view are presently all the same size; but for
example if we were to autodetect email addresses in commit messages,
we might have both single- and double- sided avatars in the same
page). By hashing on email+size only we would lose the benefit of
cache when using the same avatar at separate sizes.
You could have a hash key of "$email_$size", or something similar to
fake an array hash key.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help