Re: EasyGit Integration

Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:

I would not object to

 - old behavior: revert the commit by creating an "anti-commit":

	git revert <cmit-name>

 - new extension: revert the state of the working tree to the HEAD:

	git revert [--] pathspec

which would kind of match the semantics of "git checkout" does.

That's subjective, but I would find this more misleading than the
current behavior. To me, that would let beginners think that both
commands do similar things, and then "why the hell does git revert
HEAD^^ create a commit while git revert -- foo.c doesn't???"-kind of
questions.

my 2 cents,

-- 
Matthieu