Re: Git merge selective files

Avery Pennarun [off-list ref] writes:

And the "'merge --squash' and don't commit the changes you don't want"
option looks okay to me too.

Whatever you do to prepare the tree contents to suit the desire of the
original request, I think it is essential not to record the result of such
an operation as a merge (because it is not, and it will screw up later
merges).

Use of "merge --squash" in this thread is a very good suggestion.

Good job.