Re: [PATCH] autoconf: Add link tests to each AC_CHECK_FUNC() test

Hello, and please forgive me for replying to a very old thread,
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/99159>.
(BTW, is that frowned upon on this list?)

* Junio C Hamano wrote on Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 09:04:21AM CET:

"David M. Syzdek" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Update configure.ac to test libraries for getaddrinfo, strcasestr, memmem,
strlcpy, strtoumax, setenv, unsetenv, and mkdtemp.  The default compilers
on FreeBSD 4.9-SECURITY and FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4 do not generate warnings
for missing prototypes unless `-Wall' is used. This behavior renders the
results of AC_CHECK_FUNC() void on these platforms. The test AC_SEARCH_LIBS()
verifies a function is valid by linking to symbol within the system libraries.

This description does not make sense.  AC_CHECK_FUNC does not take into
account prototypes in the test; instead, it tries to link a program that
requires the function symbol.  In that matter, the patch that introduced

It's been a looong time since I did any sizeable autoconf/m4 hacking, but
the repetitititiveness of this patch loudly calls for a convenience macro
of a higher order, perhaps something like:

        AC_DEFUN([GIT_CHECK_FUNC],[
         AC_CHECK_FUNC([$1],[
          AC_SEARCH_LIBS([$1},,
          [$2],[$3])],
          [$3])])

Then we can use it like:

	GIT_CHECK_FUNC([getaddrinfo],[NO_IPV6=],[NO_IPV6=YesPlease])

(which is 1689c5de8730ea334535337a341db3c7a21ad002) is not necessary.
However, there might have been another reason altogether why David was
seeing false configure test results on his system, and it would be
interesting to know about them (both to possibly fix Autoconf, and the
comment introducing GIT_CHECK_FUNC in configure.ac).

Otherwise, I'd propose reverting the commit.

Thanks for any feedback,
Ralf