Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Nick Edelen wrote:
quoted
man I can sure be blind at times... alright fixed the latter two
comments. I changed the test file because that particular test wanted
upload-pack to fail through the revision walker, which it could only
now do if shallow objects were involved.
OK. However, since now we have 2 different paths for creating object
list instead of only one (the existing one in upload-pack and the one in
pack-objects), I'd prefer if you could add another test case to make
sure the pack-objects path also fails appropriately.
The rest looks fine to me, and with the test issue fixed you could add
my:
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org
to your next submission. Oh and you might change the subject prefix to
[PATCH] as well since I think this won't be WIP anymore.
True and true. Thanks.