Re: [PATCH 12/23] transport.c::get_refs_via_curl(): do not leak refs_url

Hi,

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Jakub Narebski[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Mike Hommey <redacted>
Subject: [WIP Patch 02/12] Some cleanup in get_refs_via_curl()

So what is the title of this patch? "transport.c::get_refs_via_curl():
do not leak refs_url" or "Some cleanup in get_refs_via_curl()"?

See my reply to patch #19.

Perhaps it should be "transport.c: Do not leak refs_url in
get_refs_via_curl()"...?

I think it's a matter of preference. I'll put them side-by-side to
demonstrate this better:

transport.c: Do not leak refs_url in get_refs_via_curl()
transport.c::get_refs_via_curl(): do not leak refs_url

There isn't any important difference between the two other than form.

-- 
Cheers,
Ray Chuan