RE: Best way to merge two repos with same content, different history
From: Kelly F. Hickel <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:54
-----Original Message----- From: Avery Pennarun [mailto:apenwarr@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 12:01 PM To: Kelly F. Hickel Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Best way to merge two repos with same content, different history On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Kelly F. Hickel [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Stated another way, I have two repositories, "new" and "old", where the files in the initial commit on branch "B1" in "new" have exactly the same content as the last commit on branch "B1" in "old". There also exist various branches in "new" based on "B1". I'd liketoquoted
merge all the commits from "new" into "old", but the SHA1s are different, presumably because the history leading up to those pointsarequoted
different. Other than using manually format-patch on every branch in new, then applying the patches (presumably with regular old patch, sincethequoted
ancestor commit IDs won't match), is there any "good" way to merge"new"quoted
into "old"?The usual replacement for "manually using format-patch" is to use "git rebase." It does pretty much exactly what you're describing, assuming you don't do too many complicated merges in the meantime. Another option is to use the .git/info/grafts file. Here's a brief intro: http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GraftPoint You'd use that to pretend the parent of your top-skimmed branch is actually the equivalent commit in your new branch. Then could run "git filter-branch" to make the graft permanent, and get all your users to switch to the new repository. Or you could skip the filter-branch stuff and keep the really hold history somewhere else, available for use if someone installs the graft in their local repo. This would lead to a smaller repository in the general case. (I gather that's what the Linux kernel does for per-2.6.11 versions.) Have fun, Avery
Thanks Avery, This appears to be just what I was looking for! I'll fiddle with it a bit to see if I can convince it to work for me. Thanks, Kelly