Hi there,
I've posted a git repository to the web that is an rsync copy of my
development archive's .git directory, with update-server-info run on it. Now
if I understand correctly, this contains a single file for every
commit/file/whatever else I ever made, which is a paint over HTTP. I have then
recently learned about the wonder that is git repack, which I would love to
use on this repository, were it not for this comment in its manpage:
8< ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Especially useful when packing a repository that is used for private
development and there is no need to worry about people fetching via dumb
protocols from it. 8<
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It says this relating to the '-a' option, but it makes me wonder if I'll break
copies of the repo that other people have pulled if I use 'repack'? What are
the possible interactions and things to keep in mind between repack and dumb
protocols?
In any case, I would like to suggest that the rather ominous-sounding text in
the manpage be replaced with something more concrete, i.e. "If you repack an
archive that has people fetching via dumb protocols from it, X, Y, and Z will
happen."
Thanks,
Andreas
(please cc--not subscribed)