Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [RFC PATCH] am: do not do any reset on --abort

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:49

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
We really have no idea what state the tree is in at this
point, and whether the user might have done useful work on
top of it. So let's err on the side of keeping the user's
data intact.

The downside is that if they do have cruft to get rid of, or
want to pretend as if earlier parts of the series that were
applied did not exist, they must manually "git reset --hard"
now.
I do not see it as a major downside, but not telling them that they may
want to when we avoid doing it ourselves might be.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <redacted>
---
This is a followup to:

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/118373

 git-am.sh |    4 ----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-am.sh b/git-am.sh
index 578780b..a7e24cf 100755
--- a/git-am.sh
+++ b/git-am.sh
@@ -240,10 +240,6 @@ then
 			exec git rebase --abort
 		fi
 		git rerere clear
-		test -f "$dotest/dirtyindex" || {
-			git read-tree --reset -u HEAD ORIG_HEAD
-			git reset ORIG_HEAD
-		}
 		rm -fr "$dotest"
 		exit ;;
 	esac
-- 
1.6.3.1.250.g01b8b.dirty
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help