Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: (topgit question) deleting a dependency

From: Sitaram Chamarty <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:41

On 2009-04-29, Uwe Kleine-König [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello Sitaram,

[mmh, your mail didn't have me in the addressees, wonder why.]
Sorry - I'm using gmane over slrn (NNTP) from a work server!
Slrn splits the "nntp post" and sends it to gmane, which is
quite happy to post on behalf of sitaramc@gmail.com (my
personal address) but slrn then tries to deliver the "cc"
part using my local (work) mailer, with my work email
address as the "From".  I'm explicitly cc-ing you now, so to
you the email will appear to come from my work address.
Sorry about that!
quoted
This is a little beyond my comprehension :(  However, this
is also why I am limiting myself to

  - a single level of dependencies in tg, (master -->
    multiple t/something --> t/all), and

  - no changes of its own in t/all

When any of the t/something graduates to master, t/all will
be blown away (safe, since it has no changes of its own) and
What makes you think it will "be blown away"?  Or alternatively, what do
My mistake.  I meant that I will blow it away myself, and
create a new one with the same name except it's list of deps
will exclude the one that graduated.
you mean saying that?  I often use the same approach and I never had the
feeling anything is blown away.  If upstream uses your t/something patch
it just merges into t/something making it empty without changing the
How?  When I update master from upstream and then tg update
on t/all?
corresponding tree (assuming master contains no other changes).  Then
when t/something is merged into t/all nothing happens, because
t/something's tree didn't change.

So the only thing is that t/all depends on an empty tg-branch.
Regards,

Sitaram
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help