söndag 26 april 2009 21:25:13 skrev Linus Torvalds [off-list ref]:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
I had a similar patch that disables inum checking in my private tree for
different reasons of my own; the set of fields your patch ignores is a
compatible superset of, and I think makes more sense than, what I was
planning to do, so no objections from me on this _optional_ feature.
Maybe we should just remove those checks entirely?
Blessed-by: Robin Rosenberg [off-list ref]
-- robin