Re: [EGIT PATCH] Add support for writing/appending .gitignore file
From: Alex Blewitt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:37
On 20 Apr 2009, at 07:32, Robin Rosenberg wrote:
måndag 20 april 2009 04:40:42 skrev Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.comquoted
: On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Robin Rosenberg [off-list ref] wrote: One advantage of attaching issues is you don't have MUA problems :-) I'll try and get a patch to work via git-send-email later.The problem is review. With e-mail I can just hit reply and comment on your patch. Did your try the SMTP interface to gmail? I think e-mailing inlined patches is a nearly perfect. Inline-attachment is ok with me. That makes it possible to comment on them like any email in my mail program.
Right, but the same approach is possible in a bug tracking system - just comment. And people get a notification that a change has occurred, too. Except instead of one giant inbox of a collection of patches, all the discussion/feedback/comments are limited to the right scope (i.e. just that bug/patch). In fact, quite a lot of review goes on outside of the mail client and directly inside the editor e.g. via Mylyn or internal web browser to the issue. It also allows others - who might not be on the original 'to' list - to subscribe to a bug (or star it, in Google's terms) to receive notifications and see specific updates.
quoted
I've been incrementally committing to my local git copy. Whenever I do git format-patch <since> it spews out individual patchettes. How can I use git to generate one patch? I could git diff <since>, but that's not following the SUBMITTING_PATCHES, is it?Often, after a long session, you end up with a "mess" of commits, many which don't make sense to anyone but you. For this you use rebase -i to clean up.
Great, that's useful to know. Unfortunately, I get an error when I try this: apple:egit alex$ git status # On branch master # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 9 commits. # nothing to commit (working directory clean) apple:egit alex$ git rebase -i origin/master Working tree is dirty apple:egit alex$ git rebase -i d0fd6f96b9311b972c6bffa8680544607d7e3c56 Working tree is dirty apple:egit alex$ I'm probably doing something obviously wrong here, but I don't know how to understand the difference between 'working tree is dirty' and 'working directory clean', especially since git status (or git commit - a) doesn't show any differences. Please excuse me whilst I figure out how to get comfortable working with git ... Alex