Hi,
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:09:50 +0200, "Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)"
[off-list ref] wrote:
Is there some kind of reason that the branches directory is
not created with +s permissions?
Probably because it isn't really used anymore. It's more like a
historical artifact. Branch refs actually live in refs/heads/ and the
like (or in the packed-refs file).
-Jan