Re: [PATCH 5/5] docs/checkout: clarify what "non-branch" means

Mark Levedahl [off-list ref] writes:

I think the question being posed is: Would unifying branch names across all 
git commands (i.e., always accepting refs/heads/master as naming branch 
master, and accepting master when that is unambiguous) sufficiently benefit 
new users...

My knee-jerk reaction is that what you are saying is backwards.

When do new people even need to know about refs/heads vs refs/tags with
modern Porcelain command set?