Re: [PATCH] builtin-branch - allow deleting a fully specified branch-name

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

And I can see why you might think of it that way, because that is what
the synopsis in git-checkout(1) says. :) But it is really:

  git checkout -b <branch> <commit>

I'm not sure if changing that synopsis would really help, or if it is
a bit too subtle.

I think in many places we used to be stricter in terminology (e.g. when we
only need tree-ish we used to write tree-ish) but during the "usability
and approachiablility drive" people updated doc with "most of the time the
command takes commit, so we say commit".

I think "the apporachable part" aka "synopsis" should be kept the way it
is, but we should clarify in the description when the most general form is
different from the white lie we feed to newbies.