Re: [PATCH 1/3] git remote update: Report error for non-existing groups

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:20:36AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

I don't know what users want to see when they say "default" explicitly
without having an explicit configuration.  Should it do the same thing as
"git remote update"?

I'm not sure we have a choice anymore; is it worth breaking
compatibility to "fix" something that doesn't actually seem to be
harming anyone?

Nope.  I do not use the "remote update" myself to begin with, and I
somehow suspect that the reason it does not seem to be harming anyone is
because nobody sane uses these "remote groups".

Anyway, I took the patch as-is already.