Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: bsd group semantics

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:32

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:32:14AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
My point was if I belong only to my personal group and git.git work tree
is owned by junio.junio to begin with, you would never be able to notice
any breakage with such a test.
Ah, I see. Yes, you would need to belong to at least two groups to make
such a test feasible.

Such a requirement is generally outside the scope of running the
test suite; do you want to just ditch the g+s test, then, or do you want
me to work up something conditional based on the Makefile flag?
For now, I'd suggest teaching the test not to care about g+s bit.
After all, they are about giving correct mode bits to files and
directories.  Correct mode bits for group do not mean anything if you make
them owned by a wrong group, but that is not something we have tested so
far, and can be a separate test anyway.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help