Nanako Shiraishi wrote:
Quoting rocketraman@fastmail.fm:
quoted
+ - The 'maint' branch is updated to the new release.
+
+ $ git checkout maint
+ $ git merge master
+
+ This is equivalent to deleting maint and recreating it from
+ master, but it preserves the maint reflog.
After giving a recipe that is better than an alternative, what's
the point of describing an inferior alternative as "equivalent",
when it is obviously not "equivalent"?
Is this better:
The resulting maint tree is equivalent to deleting maint and
recreating it from the tip of master, but merging from master
preserves the maint reflog.
Cheers,
Raman