Re: [PATCH] Documentation: minor consistency fixes in git-difftool.txt.

On  0, Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] wrote:

Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 25.03.2009 08:17:

quoted

David Aguilar [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

--- a/Documentation/git-difftool.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-difftool.txt

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
 DESCRIPTION
 -----------
 'git-difftool' is a git command that allows you to compare and edit files
-between revisions using common diff tools.  'git difftool' is a frontend
+between revisions using common diff tools.  'git-difftool' is a frontend

I thought that the recent trend is to spell these as 'git difftool' (two
separate words), although I didn't follow the discussion on quoting styles
closely, so I do not know which of sq, dq or backtick is preferred.

Can somebody help me out here?

I'd say it's backticks for commands/code, but I think discussion about a
style guide is still on.

Michael

Cool, I'll keep my eye on it.

I was merely going for consistency with the existing
documentation (such as git-mergetool.txt).
Once a consensus is reached I'll go ahead and follow suite.

Thanks,

-- 

	David