Thread (20 messages) flat view 20 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 04/10] test-lib: Replace uses of $(expr ...) by POSIX shell features.

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:25

Hi,

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
quoted
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Johannes Sixt wrote:
quoted
In particular:

- Test case counting can be achieved by arithmetic expansion.

- The name of the test, e.g. t1234, can be computed with ${0%%} and 
  ${0##}.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <redacted>
I guess this makes the tests less slow on Windows?  Do you have 
numbers?
Actually, while reading through test-lib.sh I found those expr 
expressions quite difficult to understand, and my primary intent was to 
make the code more readable. Furthermore, as you can see in the hunk 
that touches test_known_broken_{ok,failure}_ that the $(( )) construct 
is already in use, so it's also a change to improve consistency.

The shorter runtime (primarily on Windows) is just a nice side effect, 
although the gain probably vanishes in the noise.
Actually, I should not have written that mail that late at night: 'expr' 
is a bash builtin.
quoted
FWIW I run the tests on Windows with -j10 these days, and they take 
about 15 minutes on a quad core 3GHz machine (which I may use from 
time to time; the machine is not mine, otherwise it would run Linux).
Last time I tried -j<something> it bailed out early. I didn't try again 
since then. Sequential tests finish in 30-40 minutes here, but I don't 
run SVN tests.
In msysGit, I updated the /share/msysGit/run-tests.sh script to make use 
of -j5.  If you work on a newer branch than 'devel', you most probably 
need the changes from 'release-preview', as my 
test-results/<basename>-<pid> patch broke the original assumption of 
run-tests.sh.

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help