On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:31:19PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
I was told on IRC that this has been discussed already not so long ago,
and looking on the archive[1], all i seen was bikesheeding . Here is a
patch :-)
Unfortunately, the implementation is not the problem, but picking the best
name. The first letter "m" will be taken in a short while by the "merge"
command for "rebase -i -p", so "message" is out, sadly.
But the "rephrase" command will be part of the "rebase -i -p" series when
I will finally be able to submit it.
Also, I thought the general plan was to add such features to the
git-sequencer work which will (hopefully) eventually replace "rebase
-i". Dscho, can you give a brief update on how that is coming? Are
rebase patches worth thinking about?
-Peff