Re: [PATCH/RFC] recv_sideband: Band #2 always goes to stderr

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I deliberatly avoided "%.*s" in the former hunk (1) because of the posts
that we had yesterday about potentially misbehaved fprintf in the case
where the precision is 0;

Didn't that turn out to be a false alarm?

Yes. A party who will remain nameless was reading the wrong man page
section (printf(1) vs printf(3)). :-)

j.