Re: git-svn and repository hierarchy?

On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:58:36AM -0500, Peter Harris wrote:

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Josef Wolf wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:48:14PM -0500, Peter Harris wrote:

quoted

True, but in my experience it happens considerably less often with
git. I find and fix most of my typos when reviewing my change-set
before doing a "git push" or "git svn dcommit".

So you are rewriting yourself but not accept rewrites by svn ;-)

No, I am not rewriting myself *after I publish*. I see the smiley, but
I think you missed the point.

"git push" or "svn ci" is the end of the rewrites.

I see.  Thanks for the clarification!

quoted

quoted

Indeed. Or even not-so-random names, such as cloneX/topic-name if you
prefer.

That would have the risk of multiple clones pushing to the same branch.

Only if cloneX pushes to cloneY/topic-name. Does each clone not have a
unique name?

I'd rather not rely on the clones having unique names.

quoted

Does that look sane?

No. But it doesn't look any more insane than any other workflow
involving Subversion that I can think of. :-)

OK, I parse that as "there's not much room for improvement" :-)

Thanks for your great help!  I have learned a lot in this thread!